On May 9 2013, at 05:38 , Alan Bateman wrote: > On 08/05/2013 23:05, Martin Buchholz wrote: >> Alan (et al): Ping. >> > I've looked through the webrev. > > The scary part is subsequenceRaw where the offsets including the position. I > don't see anything obviously wrong and the tests should catch any issues. I > don't see any issue conditionally generating the isDirect/order methods > although it should been harmless. > > Mike - as this is an API change, are you going to looking after the paperwork?
Yes, I can do that. Since the proposed API is the part that's most complete I think we can proceed with that. Mike
