An intermediate result from an unnecessary refactoring. Thanks for catching.
—Dan On Aug 6, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Brent Christian <brent.christ...@oracle.com> wrote: > Looks fine to me, though I'm not a Reviewer (but I think I "contributed" a > fair number of those warnings O:). > > One question: why was enext added?: > > 1249 Entry<K,V> enext = (Entry<K,V>) newTable[i]; > 1250 e.next = enext; > > Thanks, > -Brent > > On 8/6/13 2:11 PM, Dan Smith wrote: >> Please review this warnings cleanup. >> >> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8022442 (not yet >> visible) >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlsmith/8022442/webrev.00/ >> >> —Dan >>
