On 08/07/2013 12:23 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
On Aug 6, 2013, at 2:43 PM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
On 08/06/2013 11:11 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
Please review this warnings cleanup.
Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8022442 (not yet
visible)
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dlsmith/8022442/webrev.00/
—Dan
Hi Dan,
I've seen that you have introduce a common super interface for entry and tree
node,
I suppose that you check that there is no performance regression.
I wonder if an abstract class is not better than an interface because as far as
I know
CHA implemented in hotspot doesn't work on interface
(but I may be wrong, there is perhaps a special optimization for arrays).
To make sure I understand: your concern is that an aastore will be more
expensive when assigning to a KeyValueData[] than to an Object[] (or even to
SomeOtherClass[])?
For what it's worth, all assignments to table[i] are statically known to be
safe. E.g.:
Entry<K,V> next = (Entry<K,V>) e.next;
...
table[i] = next;
So surely a smart VM only does the check once?
Here are some other things that might be concerns, but don't apply here:
- interface method invocations: there are no methods in the interface to invoke
- checkcast to an interface: all the casts are to concrete classes (Entry,
TreeBin, TreeNode)
(There are some unchecked casts from KeyValueData to KeyValueData with
different type parameters, but I assume these don't cause any checkcasts.)
—Dan
Hi,
FWIW, I compiled old and new HashMap.java and did a javap on the classes.
javap outputs: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/hm-8022442/
differences:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~plevart/misc/hm-8022442/hm.javap.stripped.diff
Besides unneeded introduction of local variable discussed already, there
seem to be 4 new checkcasts in the following locations (new HashMap.java):
public java.util.HashMap(int, float);
Code:
0: aload_0
1: invokespecial #10 // Method
java/util/AbstractMap."<init>":()V
4: aload_0
5: getstatic #11 // Field
EMPTY_TABLE:[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;
* 8: checkcast #12 // class
"[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;"*
11: putfield #13 // Field
table:[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;
14: aload_0
15: aconst_null
...
private void inflateTable(int);
Code:
...
22: aload_0
23: iload_2
24: anewarray #44 // class
java/util/HashMap$KeyValueData
* 27: checkcast #12 // class
"[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;"*
30: putfield #13 // Field
table:[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;
33: return
...
void resize(int);
Code:
...
20: return
21: iload_1
22: anewarray #44 // class
java/util/HashMap$KeyValueData
* 25: checkcast #12 // class
"[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;"*
28: astore 4
30: aload_0
31: aload 4
...
private void readObject(java.io.ObjectInputStream) throws
java.io.IOException, java.lang.ClassNotFoundException;
Code:
...
82: invokevirtual #141 // Method
sun/misc/Unsafe.putIntVolatile:(Ljava/lang/Object;JI)V
85: aload_0
86: getstatic #11 // Field
EMPTY_TABLE:[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;
* 89: checkcast #12 // class
"[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;"*
92: putfield #13 // Field
table:[Ljava/util/HashMap$KeyValueData;
95: aload_1
96: invokevirtual #142 // Method
java/io/ObjectInputStream.readInt:()I
...
...but they are all in the infrequently called methods/constructor.
Regards, Peter