On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
Hi,
Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK.
I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the number of workers
and i can reliably reproduce on my laptop, see below.
The test presumes the size should always increase but fails when it observes a
new new size less than the previously observed size.
Is that a valid assumption?
I guess it should be a valid assumption.
Thanks to Peter for a good suggestion for preserving this
assumption without needing to block (or messily avoid blocking)
on traversal, and to Paul for helping to re-test. An update is
now in our CVS and in lambda, so can also now move to tl.
-Doug
