On Sep 2, 2013, at 1:18 PM, Doug Lea <d...@cs.oswego.edu> wrote: > On 08/28/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Levart wrote: >> On 08/28/2013 12:10 PM, Paul Sandoz wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Intermittent failures were reported with the CHM toArray test in the JDK. >>> >>> I updated the tests to increase the number of runs and the number of workers >>> and i can reliably reproduce on my laptop, see below. >>> >>> The test presumes the size should always increase but fails when it >>> observes a >>> new new size less than the previously observed size. >>> >>> Is that a valid assumption? >> >> I guess it should be a valid assumption. > > Thanks to Peter for a good suggestion for preserving this > assumption without needing to block (or messily avoid blocking) > on traversal, and to Paul for helping to re-test. An update is > now in our CVS and in lambda, so can also now move to tl. >
Here is the fix in the lambda repo which can be applied to tl: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/rev/b73937e96ae0 http://hg.openjdk.java.net/lambda/lambda/jdk/raw-rev/b73937e96ae0 Paul.
