On 4 okt 2013, at 00:49, Coleen Phillmore <coleen.phillim...@oracle.com> wrote:

> 
> Thanks Dan -
> 
> On 10/3/2013 4:28 PM, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote:
>> > open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8025238_jdk
>> 
>> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodInBacktrace.sh
>>    No comments.
>> 
>> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodInBacktraceApp.java
>>    line 78:         t.setDaemon(true);
>>        Why make the target thread a daemon? Wouldn't it be a more
>>        complete test to do Thread.join() of that thread just to
>>        be sure that the target thread has finished (and is not
>>        stuck)?
> 
> Staffan, can you answer this?

You could do it either way. I don't have a strong opinion. It's possible that 
the deamonization is a leftover from one of my iterations of the test.

/Staffan


> 
> Coleen
> 
>> 
>> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodInBacktraceTargetB.java
>> test/java/lang/instrument/RedefineMethodInBacktraceTargetB_2.java
>>    Nice sync logic with the test driver.
>> 
>> Thumbs up.
>> 
>> Dan
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/3/13 12:02 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>>> Summary: Redefined class in stack trace may not be found by method_idnum so 
>>> handle null.
>>> 
>>> This is a simple change.  I had another change to save the method name (as 
>>> u2) in the backtrace, but it's not worth the extra footprint in backtraces 
>>> for this rare case.
>>> 
>>> The root problem was that we save method_idnum in the backtrace (u2) 
>>> instead of Method* to avoid Method* from being redefined and deallocated.  
>>> I made a change to InstanceKlass::method_from_idnum() to return null rather 
>>> than the last method in the list, which causes this crash.   Dan and I went 
>>> down the long rabbit-hole of why method_idnum is changed for obsolete 
>>> methods and we think there's some cleanup and potential bugs in this area.  
>>> But this is not that change.  I'll file another bug to continue this 
>>> investigation for jdk9 (or 8uN).
>>> 
>>> Staffan created a test - am including core-libs for the review request.  
>>> Also tested with all of the vm testbase tests, mlvm tests, and 
>>> java/lang/instrument tests.
>>> 
>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8025238/
>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8025238
>>> 
>>> test case for jdk8 repository:
>>> 
>>> open webrev at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/8025238_jdk
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Coleen
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to