On 10/7/2013 3:49 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 07/10/2013 09:24, Mandy Chung wrote:
JDK 8 was feature complete in June and there just isn't sufficient time remaining to get agreement and feedback on an API to examine the caller frames. To that end, I propose to restore the old unsupported Reflection.getCallerClass(int) and that we will look to define a standard API for JDK 9.

Webrev at:
  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mchung/jdk8/webrevs/8025799/

It remains to be an unsupported API and JDK should not use this method and it's not annotated with @CallerSensitive. I considered detecting if this method is called by a system class (loaded by null loader) and throw an error. I decided to minimize the compatibility risk in case if there is any existing code added to the bootclasspath depending on this private API.
I liked the direction this was going with the walkStack and firstCaller proposal but it is way too late in jdk8 to have any time to get feedback. So I agree that temporarily restoring the unsupported Reflection.getCallerClass(int) is the right thing for now. As the standard API is likely to be significant then it probably warrants a JEP.


I agree and I meant to mention that too. I will submit a JEP and target it for JDK 9.

As regards the webrev then the changes looks okay. I guess you could rename one of the native methods to avoid the non-obvious name mangling but since it is only temporary then I could live with what you have.

As it's temporary, I will leave it as it is.

Thanks
Mandy

Reply via email to