On 17/10/2013 00:21, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Dmitry,

I think you are correct: that slipped by both me and the reviewers. I have 
reopened the issue and posted an amendment to the original webrev here:

http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8010371/webrev.4-amendment/

I've restored the bug fields and I assume you'll create a new bug for the follow-up. Sorry this was missed in the original review (probably because it went through so many iterations).

-Alan.

Reply via email to