Continuing the discussion from http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/net-dev/2013-October/007574.html under new issue ID:
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8026806 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8026806/webrev/ Thanks, Brian On Oct 17, 2013, at 8:06 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote: > > On Oct 17, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Alan Bateman wrote: > >> On 17/10/2013 00:21, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >>> Dmitry, >>> >>> I think you are correct: that slipped by both me and the reviewers. I have >>> reopened the issue and posted an amendment to the original webrev here: >>> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8010371/webrev.4-amendment/ >>> >> I've restored the bug fields and I assume you'll create a new bug for the >> follow-up. Sorry this was missed in the original review (probably because it >> went through so many iterations). >> >> -Alan. > > Yes I will create a new one, thanks. > > Brian
