Hi Andreas,

A few nits:

Class.java: 

 import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.Collections;
 import java.util.HashSet;

unused import.

AnnotationSupport.java:

+    /**
+     * Equivalent to calling {@code getDirectlyAndIndirectlyPresentAnnotations(
+     * annotations, annoClass, false)}.
+     */

I think it is equivalent to annotations, annoClass, true

Otherwise looks good. I can sponsor this fix.

cheers
/Joel

On 21 okt 2013, at 21:01, Andreas Lundblad <andreas.lundb...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> New revision up for review:
> 
> http://aoeu.se/webrevs/8019420-and-8004912/webrev.01
> 
> The following has been addressed since webrev.00:
> 
> - Order of directly / indirectly present annotations now respects the order 
> of the keys in the given map of annotations.
> 
> - A new test has been added to test the above behavior.
> 
> best regards,
> Andreas
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: andreas.lundb...@oracle.com
> To: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 4:00:08 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / 
> Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
> Subject: RFR: 8004912: Repeating annotations - getAnnotationsByType is not 
> working as expected
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Please review the fix for JDK-8004912 and JDK-8019420 below.
> 
> Description:
> 
> The behavior of Class.get[Declared]AnnotationsByType was wrong. These methods 
> delegate to sun.reflect.annotation.AnnotationSupport which has been rewritten.
> 
> NonInheritableContainee.java is added and contains the test referred to in 
> JDK-8019420.
> 
> RepeatedUnitTest.java have been updated to include the test cases in 
> JDK-8004912.
> 
> There are more tests available in 
> tl/langtools/test/tools/javac/annotations/repeatingAnnotations/combo/ReflectionTest.java
>  (NB. this file is in the langtools repo)
> 
> 
> Link to web review:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alundblad/8019420-and-8004912/
> 
> Link to bug reports:
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8004912
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8019420
> 
> 
> -- Andreas Lundblad

Reply via email to