On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote:
> It is good to clarify that the streams are closed.
>
> I find the following updated wording a little odd, "If a mapped stream is
> {@code null} then it treated as if it was an empty stream." I thought the
> previous wording was better, but that could be just me.
>
I was hopping to use the term "mapped stream" to avoid some repetition for "the
result of the mapping function" etc, but wording seems a little garbled.
How about:
If a mapped stream is {@code null} an empty stream is used, instead.
Paul.
