> On 20 Jan 2014, at 15:18, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 3:18 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> It is good to clarify that the streams are closed. >> >> I find the following updated wording a little odd, "If a mapped stream is >> {@code null} then it treated as if it was an empty stream." I thought the >> previous wording was better, but that could be just me. > > I was hopping to use the term "mapped stream" to avoid some repetition for > "the result of the mapping function" etc, but wording seems a little garbled. > > How about: > > If a mapped stream is {@code null} an empty stream is used, instead.
Thanks Paul. Seems fine to me. -Chris. > Paul. > > > >