On Mar 12, 2014, at 10:23 PM, John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote: > P.S. FTR, I wish we could also remove the per-object monitor from its > privileged position, so not all objects are burdened by it, and other forms > of lock can be switched into the existing notation on a type-by-type basis. > This is obviously a long, long term wish. A starting point is a notion of > "this object has no monitor".
Like an instance of a value type? Paul. > Probably the keyword cannot be repurposed but would eventually be deprecated. > And the Moon will reach Roche limit. > > – John > >> On Mar 12, 2014, at 2:12 PM, John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >> I think that we've covered all the angles, and that we can remove it. >> >> – John >> >>> On Mar 12, 2014, at 1:44 PM, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Currently i cannot find any external uses of it.
