----- Original Message ----- > On 03/19/2014 01:51 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > > On 2014-03-18 19:25, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 03/18/2014 06:22 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote: > >>> The intent was for #3 to cover this case (i.e. whatever Oracle does now) > >>> and for #2 to be what the GNU/Linux distributions want (i.e. binaries > >>> with > >>> all debuginfo generated and left intact so they can do their own > >>> stripping). > >> Mmm, but maybe that will break things when debuginfo isn't installed. > >> In fact, I already know that it has broken some things. So it's not > >> ideal. > > > > Which case is it that will break? #3 or #2? What would an ideal solution > > be for you? > > I think the problem was that jstack and jmap didn't work until the > debuginfo package was installed. This tells me that the debuginfo > stripping in our Linux build system is too aggressive for this purpose. >
Yes, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010786 The distro builds strip too much and remove the needed symtab from libjvm.so. > I think that's something we must fix ourselves. What we really > need from OpenJDK is a way to build with complete debuginfo in > both binaries and jarfiles. This was my intent with #2. The jstack/jmap issue needs to be fixed by stripping less debuginfo post-build on libjvm.so. > > Andrew. > > > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/) Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
