Hi Peter, On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:21 AM, Peter Levart <peter.lev...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to Aleksey for re-establishing the access, I bring you results of the > microbenchmark from his quad-core Cortex-A9: Thanks to you and Aleksey for taking the initiative to test on that platform. > ...as can be seen, the double-checked read-then-volatile-read+CAS trick is > about 15% faster than classic volatile-read+CAS in this case. Just to be sure, by “double-checked read-then-volaite-read+CAS trick” you intend "the variant with two methods toString/toStringSlow?” Thanks, Brian
