On 25/08/2014 18:37, Martin Buchholz wrote:
Hi friends of ByteArrayOutputStream,
I'm trying to clean up an apparent oversight when I tried to fix huge
array resizing back in
6933217: Huge arrays handled poorly in core libraries
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8055949
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~martin/webrevs/openjdk9/ByteArrayOutputStream-MAX_ARRAY_SIZE/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Emartin/webrevs/openjdk9/ByteArrayOutputStream-MAX_ARRAY_SIZE/>
The 2x capacity gap was noticed by real users!
The change to BAOS looks okay, I don't recall why it wasn't updated with
the previous changes.
I'm not sure about adding a test with @ignore though, maybe the @test
should just be dropped to avoid the temptation to "fix" the test before
there is support for selecting tests based on the resources available.
-Alan
