On 11/09/2014 01:21, Martin Buchholz wrote:


    For the comment in ZipInputStream then it might be better to move
    that to readEnd. My preference would be to not include the part
    starting "As of 2014-08, phyton ..." as that might not interesting
    in years to come.


I moved the comment into readEnd's javadoc. I think laying out the compatibility landscape is sufficiently useful that the comment about python's implementation should stay, especially given that python has no plans to "fix" theirs.
Having the first 3 paragraphs in readEnd should be good (thanks), I would think that the notes on python and the link to its issue tracker might be better put into the JIRA issue for anyone that wants to dig into more of the history.

-Alan.

Reply via email to