On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 11/09/2014 01:21, Martin Buchholz wrote: > > >> For the comment in ZipInputStream then it might be better to move that to >> readEnd. My preference would be to not include the part starting "As of >> 2014-08, phyton ..." as that might not interesting in years to come. > > > I moved the comment into readEnd's javadoc. I think laying out the > compatibility landscape is sufficiently useful that the comment about > python's implementation should stay, especially given that python has no > plans to "fix" theirs. > > Having the first 3 paragraphs in readEnd should be good (thanks), I would > think that the notes on python and the link to its issue tracker might be > better put into the JIRA issue for anyone that wants to dig into more of > the history. > As you wish!
