Hi Daniel,
On 13/01/2015 7:53 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 13/01/15 04:52, David Holmes wrote:
Here is the new webrev with Stephen & your feedback included
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8068730/webrev.01/
(windows_time_stamp not renamed yet)
I checked the updated webrev.02 and everything looks good on the hotspot
side.
What are your plans for pushing this?
Thanks David,
My understanding is that I'll need to push that through hs-rt - since
it has changes for hotspot. I believe I'll need two reviewers - is that
right? Roger Riggs has also reviewed the changes on core-libs-dev, so
is this good to go, or do both reviewers need to be members of the hsx
project?
hsx project is defunct, so technically we're all just jdk9 reviewers,
but we still like two reviews from hotspot team members.
Also - I am not sure whether I need a sponsor (I have never pushed
anything to hs-rt - I usually push in jdk9-dev) or whether I am
allowed to push this myself (I'll use jprt in that case).
If you are a jdk9 committer then you can push yourself via jprt - full
forest submission from top-level: "jprt submit -forest -testset hotspot"
David
best regards,
-- daniel
David
-----
