Hi Paul, Yes that would indeed be possible, but after some internal discussions we though it safer to reuse the Proxy invocation path.
cheers /Joel > On 25 feb 2015, at 12:55, Paul Sandoz <paul.san...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Hi Joel, > > I could be missing something here but would it be possible to wrap the call > to m.setAccessible in a doPriv block instead? > > Paul. > > On Feb 24, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Joel Borggrén-Franck <joel.fra...@oracle.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Here is a fix for an issue with repeating annotations when a security >> manager is set. >> >> Fix is to use the Proxy invocation handler to unwrap the array containing >> the repeating annotations. In theory it might be possible to have instances >> of Annotations that are not implemented using Proxies, so the old code which >> is independent of implementation is kept as a fall-back, but the user or >> these theoretical annotations will have to configure the security policy >> accordingly. >> >> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jfranck/8073056/webrev.00/ >> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8073056 >> >> cheers >> /Joel >
