On Mar 6, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote:
> I've tried to so everything I've been asked. If this version passes
> muster with everyone I'll Javadoc all the public methods and fields
> and put it up for RFA next week.
>
Do you want to tackle the single-address access methods as a follow up issue?
If so that's fine.
> I guess it's going to need a lot of testing and security analysis.
>
Not sure about the latter, but the former yes, i can help with that and sponsor
if you like.
> I added versions of all {put,get} methods with the boolean bigEndian
> argument. This makes HeapByteBuffer much cleaner, and it does not
> need to know the machine endianness at all. I hope that's OK.
>
Yes, i like the end result in HeapByteBuffer.
Paul.
> Andrew.
>
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/unaligned.hotspot.4/
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aph/unaligned.jdk.4/
