It's good. Nice cleanup. — John On Apr 13, 2015, at 10:39 AM, Vladimir Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > > John, David, thanks for the feedback! > > What do you think about the following version: > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8057919/webrev.02/jdk > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8057919/webrev.02/jdk> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8057919/webrev.02/hotspot > <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8057919/webrev.02/hotspot> > > Best regards, > Vladimir Ivanov
- [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should work for non-JLS... Vladimir Ivanov
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should work fo... David Holmes
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should wor... Rémi Forax
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should... David Holmes
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should... Vladimir Ivanov
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should wor... John Rose
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should wor... Vladimir Ivanov
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() should... Vladimir Ivanov
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() sh... John Rose
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName() sh... David Holmes
- Re: [9] RFR (S): Class.getSimpleName... Vladimir Ivanov
