Hi Peter, I'm glad you're looking at this too! We can't have too many eyes :-)
On 30/07/15 10:38, Peter Levart wrote:
Suppose we have a Reference 'r' and it's associated ReferenceQueue 'q'. Currently it can happen that the following evaluates to true, which is surprising: q.poll() == null && r.isEnqueued()
But on the other hand this can only happen if two different threads are polling the queue - in which case only one of them will get the reference. In such a situation, the symmetric condition would not be surprising (as the other thread would get q.poll() != null): r.isEnqueued() && q.poll() == null The original bug fixed by Kim is more surprising, because there's only one Thread doing the polling, and it does get: r.isEnqueud() && q.poll() == null although nobody else is polling the queue. This should no longer occur in this situation with Kim's fix. cheers, -- daniel
