On Jul 30, 2015, at 5:33 PM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> So I think I can either: >> >> 1. Go ahead with my change + Peter's change. >> >> 2. Give this back to core-libs while I step carefully away :-) >> >> I *think* option (1) is at least an improvement. But I completely >> missed Peter's race, despite having specifically looked for problems >> there, so take my opinion with an appropriate quantity of salt. > > I vote for 1 as well. I think we have now given good coverage to the two > sources of problems (the two lock-free regions): > - reference queue state can be seen while queue state is in transition > - queue empty state can be seen while reference state is in transition
New webrev, with both changes: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kbarrett/8132306/webrev.01/
