On 7/28/15 5:50 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote:
I agree that if we make a policy decision here, we can change it and the compatibility impact is minimal.Since there already exists an implicit policy governed by like 99.9% of the existing behaviour i do not see the need to be explicit about that policy for this particular issue, so i suggest we split into two.
I followed this thread up until the last sentence. What's the resolution here? s'marks
