On 31 Jul 2015, at 04:47, Stuart Marks <stuart.ma...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 7/28/15 5:50 AM, Paul Sandoz wrote: >>> I agree that if we make a policy decision here, we can change it and the >>> compatibility impact is minimal. >> >> Since there already exists an implicit policy governed by like 99.9% of the >> existing behaviour i do not see the need to be explicit about that policy >> for this particular issue, so i suggest we split into two. > > I followed this thread up until the last sentence. What's the resolution here? > I think we should go ahead with the fix (and file a CCC just for formality), the file another issue for clarifying the current implicit behaviour. Paul.
