> On 28 Sep 2015, at 19:45, Stefan Zobel <splitera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> is it a good idea to add the "{@inheritDoc}" to the toString() Javadoc of
> Optional (and to retain it in OptionalDouble/Int/Long)?
> 
> As Stuart Marks has observed in the Double/Int/LongSummaryStatistics case
> the inherited Object.toString() doc is "mostly irrelevant"
> (see
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2015-June/034282.html)
> 
> So the {@inheritDoc} got removed from Double/Int/LongSummaryStatistics in
> JDK-8080450. I feel this would also be better for Optional.
> 

Done.


> On 28 Sep 2015, at 20:00, Stefan Zobel <splitera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> In the OptionalDouble/Int/Long Javadoc of method "empty()"
> 
> 
> * {@code Optional.empty()}. There is no guarantee that it is a singleton.
> 
> 
> should be
> 
> 
> * {@code OptionalDouble.empty()}.  There is no guarantee that it is a
> singleton.
> 
> and so on.

Done.

Thanks,
Paul.

Reply via email to