> On 13 Oct 2015, at 22:43, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
>
> I'd prefer to see "this" mentioned:
>
> "If a value is not present, invoke the specified supplier to provide
> the result, otherwise return {@code this}"
>
> While I understand the original form gave some spec wiggle room, it
> also made the method far more mysterious.
> That wiggle room is useful to avoid baking in any assumptions about the identity of the returned Optional. Paul.
