It’s nice to see these issues get resolved while I was sleeping ;-) >> On 08/11/2015 20:38, Paul Sandoz wrote: >>> : >>> The name is derived from the requirement that if the fragment is present a >>> call to getRuntimeVersionedEntry is required (or the equivalent of), thus >>> the URL is a reference to a runtime versioned entry. >> I was just wondering about something shorter, like #runtime. >> > > No objections to that.
I’ll change the fragment to #runtime >> As to whether this is implementation vs. JAR URL spec then I assume it needs >> to be spec so that libraries can create URLs that will use runtime >> versioning when access the JAR. >> > > Yeah, i don’t think we can avoid it. Ok. I guess I should put the information in JarURLConnection.
