On 26/01/16 08:39, Rafael Winterhalter wrote: > Another note on this subject: I found that applying a > reretransformation on a lambda expression's class does not provide the > original class file to the retransformer but the class file that > resulted from a previous retransformation. (If a lambda class is > retransformed several times.) This is different to "normal" classes > where the original class file is provided.
I think it is also /clearly wrong/ since it makes it at very least difficult and perhaps, depending on circumstances, impossible for a transformer to restore the original bytecode. regards, Andrew Dinn -----------
