Hi Roger, Yes that's a good remark: Applied it to SimpleConsoleLogger.java.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8150840/webrev.01/ -- daniel On 04/03/16 17:19, Roger Riggs wrote:
Hi Daniel, Good idea. SimpleConsolerLogger.java: Some of the property accesses could use the existing property actions instead of anonymous inner classes. static Level getDefaultLevel() { String levelName = AccessController.doPrivileged( new sun.security.action.GetPropertyAction("jdk.system.logger.level", "INFO")); ... Roger On 3/4/2016 6:48 AM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:[Resending with a link to the patch] Hi, Please find below a patch for: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150840 8150840: Add an internal system property to control the default level of System.Logger when java.logging is not present. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8150840/webrev.00 This patch also introduces a better separation between the SimpleConsoleLogger (created by the DefaultLoggerFinder when java.logging is not there), and the SurrogateLogger, which emulates the behavior of java.util.logging.Logger when java.logging is present but there is no custom configuration (used to be PlatformLogger.DefaultLoggerProxy). best regards, -- daniel
