David,

Thanks for approval.

Adding corelibs-dev for getting code review. Can someone, please, take a look at the partially backported changes [1]?

Best Regards,
Aleksej

[1]  http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8145039/8/00

On 03/23/2016 02:16 PM, David Buck wrote:
approved for push to jdk8u-dev pending successful code review

I understand that the code review may seem over-cautious, but as you are only 
back porting a subset of the original change set, a (hopefully trivial) review 
is still needed.

Cheers,
-Buck

On Mar 23, 2016, at 09:12, Aleksej Efimov <aleksej.efi...@oracle.com> wrote:

Hi,

Please, approve backport of xjc tool fix [1] to JDK8u-dev.
The source fix for this bug was delivered to JDK9 as part of sync process with 
upstream JAXWS project [2].
The change that fixed reported issue was partially, but cleanly backported to 
JDK8 CTypeRef class. Original JDK9 changes to this class can be viewed at this 
location [3].
Test for this issue was backported cleanly. JCK and JTREG tests (including the 
backported one) were executed over the modified JDK8 without failures.

Best Regards,
Aleksej

JDK8 webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aefimov/8145039/8/00

JDK9 changeset:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/de1f0e168eeb

JDK9 Review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-March/039553.html

JAXWS sync review thread:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2016-February/039086.html

[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145039
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150174
[3] http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jaxws/rev/ebff1bd3627a#l34.1


Reply via email to