This is about backward compatibility, but anyway would it be good to add to tests static method case (also please see the attached file):

    public static class FactoryBase {
public static JAXBContext createContext(Class[] classesToBeBound, Map<String, Object> properties) throws JAXBException {
            return tmp;
        }

public static JAXBContext createContext(String contextPath, ClassLoader classLoader, Map<String, Object> properties)
                throws JAXBException {
            return tmp;
        }
    }

    public static class Factory extends FactoryBase {
    }

Now it works fine but it might be useful as a test anyway.

It's a valid case according to spec which reads (please see point 2):

Once the provider factory class is discovered, context creation is delegated to one of its createContext(...) methods. For backward compatibility reasons, there are two ways how to implement provider factory class:

    ...

2. the class is not implementation of interface above and then it is mandated to implement the following static method signatures:

     public static JAXBContext createContext(
                                          String contextPath,
                                          ClassLoader classLoader,
Map<String,Object> properties ) throws JAXBException

     public static JAXBContext createContext(
                                          Class[] classes,
Map<String,Object> properties ) throws JAXBException


In this scenario, appropriate static method is used instead of instance method. This approach is incompatible with ServiceLoader so it can't be used with step 3.

Thanks,
Georgiy.

On 21.06.2016 20:39, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
Hi,

Please find below a somewhat trivial patch for

8150173: JAXBContext.newInstance causes PrivilegedActionException
         when createContext's declared in absract class extended
         by discovered JAXB implementation
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8150173

Patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8150173/webrev.00

This is an oversight that was introduced with JDK-8145104.

The issue is simply that newInstance() must be invoked on
the concrete class, not on the class that defines the
createContext method.

best regards,

-- daniel

import javax.xml.bind.*;
import java.util.Map;

public class Test8 {
    private static JAXBContext tmp =null;

    public static class FactoryBase {
        public static JAXBContext createContext(Class[] classesToBeBound, 
Map<String, Object> properties) throws JAXBException {
            return tmp;
        }

        public static JAXBContext createContext(String contextPath, ClassLoader 
classLoader, Map<String, Object> properties)
                throws JAXBException {
            return tmp;
        }
    }

    public static class Factory extends FactoryBase {
    }

    public static void main(String[] args) throws JAXBException {
        tmp = JAXBContext.newInstance(Test8.class);
        System.setProperty(JAXBContext.JAXB_CONTEXT_FACTORY, "Test8$Factory");
        JAXBContext.newInstance(Test8.class);
    }
}

Reply via email to