On 09/12/2016 07:57 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote:
>     is better spelled like this?
> 
>      176  *         setPendingCount(1); // only one pending, not two!
> 
> I already struggled over the wording here .... hmmm ... how about
> 
> // looks off by one, but correct!

Yes, this is better.

> I don't like the verbosity of that.  Probably something closer to
> Guava's Stopwatch would be cleaner. ... But that's a big TODO.

Ok, fine.

Thanks,
-Aleksey

Reply via email to