On čtvrtek 27. července 2017 15:01:17 CEST Alan Bateman wrote: > On 27/07/2017 10:07, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > > Yes, it seems like a desirable goal to let Graal compiler work with just > > java.base. Is there a description how to build JDK9/10 with just java.base > > that I could follow and test against? > > You can use jlink to create a run-time image that only contains > java.base (jlink --module-path $JAVA_HOME/jmods --add-modules java.base > --output smalljre).
Status update: I've just tried to run Graal compiler against JDK9 with only java.base and jdk.internal.vm.ci modules, and there are some problems. I need to resolve them first before I provide updated version of my patch. Thanks for your support so far. -jt > >> If it exposes a MBean, the dependency would be needed. > > > > Isn't there a way to require an optional dependency? That would be > > sufficient - as the classes in question are only loaded once > > java.management searches for them. E.g. only when java.management is > > installed. > > There is `requires static` but it would be a lot cleaner if the > management support could be refactored into its own service provider > module, meaning JVMCIMXBeans would be in its own module. > > -Alan
