On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Brian Burkhalter <brian.burkhal...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Dec 8, 2017, at 10:52 AM, David Lloyd <david.ll...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brian Burkhalter >> <brian.burkhal...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> Patrick’s comment made us think again about the naming here as >>> “nullStream()” would not fit for eventual equivalent methods on Reader and >>> Writer. It might be better to go with something like >>> >>> InputStream InputStream.nullSource(); >>> OutputStream.nullSink(); >>> >>> and later >>> >>> Reader.nullSource(); >>> Writer.nullSink(); >>> >>> Another alternative would be simply to reflect the class names in the >>> methods: >>> >>> InputStream InputStream.nullInputStream(); >>> OutputStream.nullOutputStream(); >>> >>> and later >>> >>> Reader.nullReader(); >>> Writer.nullWriter(); >> >> I for one prefer this alternative; it's very clear and unambiguous. > The second one?
Yes, sorry. -- - DML
