> Am 30.01.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>: > > On 29/01/2018 22:55, Brian Burkhalter wrote: >> I made a few minor changes to the CSR [1] verbiage. Probably the >> nullWriter() documentation should also be updated to explicitly mention all >> variants of both append() and write(). >> > It could although limiting it to the abstract methods should be fine too as > the append methods are specified in terms of the write methods. > > One other micro detail is that Reader/Writer support implementations > specifying the object to use for synchronization. This isn't interesting for > the Reader/Writer objects returned by the proposed static methods so a > one-line that says that the object used to synchronize operations is not > specified might help. It would avoid something synchronizing on the reader or > writer and expecting operations read/write methods to block
Is that a difference from the null InputStream/OutputStream here? -Patrick
