On Jan 30, 2018, at 8:52 AM, Patrick Reinhart <patr...@reini.net> wrote:
>> Am 30.01.2018 um 16:02 schrieb Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>: >> >> […] >> >> One other micro detail is that Reader/Writer support implementations >> specifying the object to use for synchronization. This isn't interesting for >> the Reader/Writer objects returned by the proposed static methods so a >> one-line that says that the object used to synchronize operations is not >> specified might help. It would avoid something synchronizing on the reader >> or writer and expecting operations read/write methods to block > > Is that a difference from the null InputStream/OutputStream here? Yes: there is no such lock instance variable for those classes. Probably it would not hurt to add a one liner to each method’s doc as Alan suggested. Thanks, Brian
