Hi Sergey, What do you think of the version updated with Roger’s suggested change to the verbiage?
Thanks, Brian > On Nov 9, 2018, at 12:10 PM, Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > it may be better to burn "skip()" in the fire of deprecation? and > implement the "newSkip()" which by default will call the "read()", > and then subclasses will provide its own fast/optimized implementation? > Or we still tries to take care about all corner cases for "skip()"?
