But don’t they? We intend to start generating condy in classfiles from javac soon; at that point, anyone not using ASM7 will fail when reading classfiles generated by javac.
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 4:03 AM, David Holmes <david.hol...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Is it that case that the code the uses the ASM library, like the JFR code and > jlink code, and the tests, doesn't actually _have to_ change to specifying > Opcodes.ASM7 unless they plan on using ASM7 features? If so then you could > split out the actual update of ASM from the updates to the users of ASM (some > of which may be quite fine with ASM5).
