I believe we have at least two approvals, Vladimir and me. Unless there
is something else to be done, I'll do a final sanity check and push the
code wednesday or thursday.
Tony
On 12/4/18 5:18 AM, Dmitry Chuyko wrote:
Hello,
AArch64 aes test runs pass in -Dmode=GCM.
-Dmitry
On 12/2/18 3:37 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
I am fine with Hotspot changes.
But we need to verify changes on all platforms.
I see that aarch64 also supports it in addition to SPARC.
I will run compiler/codegen/aes/ test to make sure it pass on SPARC
but we don't test aarch64.
I let you know testing results when they are done.
Thanks,
Vladimir
On 11/20/18 6:45 PM, Kamath, Smita wrote:
Hi Tony,
Thanks for your comments.
1) This intrinsic is also used with solaris-sparc, has there been a
sanity check by anyone to make sure this does not break the sparc
intrinsic? It may work as the code is now since the sparc intrinsic
will only use the first two longs in the subkeyHtbl.
Would it be possible to help with this sanity check? I don't have
the required set-up to test this scenario.
2) I have changed the code so that subkeyH corresponds to the first
two entries of subkeyHtbl. Please find the updated webrev link.
Bug link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214074
Webrev link: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~svkamath/ghash/webrev01/
Thanks and Regards,
Smita
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Scarpino [mailto:anthony.scarp...@oracle.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2018 2:05 PM
To: Kamath, Smita <smita.kam...@intel.com>; 'Vladimir Kozlov'
<vladimir.koz...@oracle.com>
Cc: Viswanathan, Sandhya <sandhya.viswanat...@intel.com>;
core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net; hotspot compiler
<hotspot-compiler-...@openjdk.java.net>
Subject: Re: RFR(S)JDK-8214074: Ghash optimization using AVX
instructions
On 11/19/18 12:50 PM, Kamath, Smita wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
I'd like to contribute an optimization for GHASH Algorithm using AVX
Instructions. I have tested this optimization on SKX x86_64 platform
and it shows ~20-30% performance improvement for larger message sizes
(for example 8k).
I, smita.kam...@intel.com <mailto:smita.kam...@intel.com> , Shay
Gueuron, (shay.gue...@intel.com <mailto:shay.gue...@intel.com>)and
Regev Shemy (regev.sh...@intel.com <mailto:regev.sh...@intel.com>) are
contributors to this code.
Link to Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214074
Link to webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~svkamath/ghash/webrev/
For testing the implementation, I have executed TestAESMain.java. I
have executed Jtreg tests and tested this code on 64 bit Windows and
Linux platforms.
Please review and let me know if you have any comments.
Thanks and Regards,
Smita
Hi,
This intrinsic is also used with solaris-sparc, has there been a
sanity check by anyone to make sure this does not break the sparc
intrinsic?
It may work as the code is now since the sparc intrinsic will only
use the first two longs in the subkeyHtbl.
In that same idea, have you consider combining the subkeyH to be the
first two of subkeyHtbl for the non-avx operations? It would
eliminate an extra two longs per instance.
Tony
