On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote:
>> this could be a good value add to introduce an API [...] > > Should I file a JDK issue then (not sure I can even)? > >> Wouldn’t this be accomplished with setMaximumFractionDigits(1) ? > > That wouldn't achieve that there's no fraction digit(s) in case of > trailing 0s. Yes it does. I just tried. Don’t set a minimum fraction digits, since you don’t actually want a minimum. Scott > >> Am Do., 17. Jan. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com>: >> >> Wouldn’t this be accomplished with setMaximumFractionDigits(1) ? >> >>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 5:13 AM, Nishit Jain <nishit.j...@oracle.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Gunnar, >>> >>> Currently there is no way to obtain the below expected behavior (to get 1K) >>> when min fraction digit is set to non-zero value. I think that is not even >>> expected when min fraction digits is set, but considering the objective of >>> compact number formatting this could be a good value add to introduce an >>> API which if set, truncates trailing fractional zeros while formatting >>> output. This may need some thought process on its feasibility. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nishit Jain >>>> On 17-01-2019 14:37, Gunnar Morling wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I took a look at the compact number formatting recently added in JDK 12. >>>> >>>> There's setMinimumFractionDigits() to control the number of fractional >>>> digits, so that e.g. 1,500 can be formatted as 1.5K. That's great, but >>>> it also will format 1,000 as 1.0K. Is there a way to have fractional >>>> digits but remove trailing zeros, so that 1,500 and 1,000 would be >>>> formatted as 1.5K and 1K, respectively?
