> since you don’t actually want a minimum. I'd like to have 1 fractional digit unless it's 0:
1,000 -> 1K (*not* 1.0K) 1,500 -> 1.5K --Gunnar Am Do., 17. Jan. 2019 um 19:15 Uhr schrieb Scott Palmer <swpal...@gmail.com>: > > > On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Gunnar Morling <gun...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > >> this could be a good value add to introduce an API [...] > > > > Should I file a JDK issue then (not sure I can even)? > > > >> Wouldn’t this be accomplished with setMaximumFractionDigits(1) ? > > > > That wouldn't achieve that there's no fraction digit(s) in case of > > trailing 0s. > > Yes it does. I just tried. Don’t set a minimum fraction digits, since you > don’t actually want a minimum. > > Scott > > > > >> Am Do., 17. Jan. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Scott Palmer > >> <swpal...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Wouldn’t this be accomplished with setMaximumFractionDigits(1) ? > >> > >>> On Jan 17, 2019, at 5:13 AM, Nishit Jain <nishit.j...@oracle.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Gunnar, > >>> > >>> Currently there is no way to obtain the below expected behavior (to get > >>> 1K) when min fraction digit is set to non-zero value. I think that is not > >>> even expected when min fraction digits is set, but considering the > >>> objective of compact number formatting this could be a good value add to > >>> introduce an API which if set, truncates trailing fractional zeros while > >>> formatting output. This may need some thought process on its feasibility. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Nishit Jain > >>>> On 17-01-2019 14:37, Gunnar Morling wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I took a look at the compact number formatting recently added in JDK 12. > >>>> > >>>> There's setMinimumFractionDigits() to control the number of fractional > >>>> digits, so that e.g. 1,500 can be formatted as 1.5K. That's great, but > >>>> it also will format 1,000 as 1.0K. Is there a way to have fractional > >>>> digits but remove trailing zeros, so that 1,500 and 1,000 would be > >>>> formatted as 1.5K and 1K, respectively?
