Hi Christoph, 
> On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:50 PM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Lance,
>  
> thanks for reviewing.

:-)
>  
> As for ZipFSTester: the printf is anyway commented out, probably only used 
> for debugging. Removing the variable was just because the IDE said it’s 
> unused. I’d rather leave it as is.

Well, i would tweak it or remove it.
>  
> As for the jarfs tests: OK, it probably makes sense to separate these out 
> into a subfolder. So I’ll move MultiReleaseJarTest to the subfolder instead 
> of moving JFSTester.

sounds like a plan
>  
> OK for you if I push this without another webrev next week?

Yes that is fine :-)

Have a good weekend!

Best
Lance
>  
> Best regards
> Christoph
>  
> From: Lance Andersen <lance.ander...@oracle.com 
> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>> 
> Sent: Freitag, 26. April 2019 18:26
> To: Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com 
> <mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>>
> Cc: core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net <mailto:core-libs-dev@openjdk.java.net>; 
> nio-...@openjdk.java.net <mailto:nio-...@openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: RFR (S): 8223015: Cleanups for zipfs tests
>  
> Hi Christoph,
>  
> Thank you for doing this.  Overall the changes look good.
>  
> A few minor thoughts
>  
> ZIpFSTester.java  - 537:  Given you removed the method variable, I would 
> tweak the printf string to make it a bit clearer that what the output its.
>  
> JFSTester.java and MultiReleaseJarTest.java -  I had the opposite feeling 
> that having a jarfs subfolder adds clarity and moving 
> MulltiReleaseJarTest.java might be the better way to go.  It helps separate 
> specific tests which are using the JarFileSystem from the ZipFileSystem 
> especially as we add more, keeping things cleaner.
>  
> Best
> Lance
>  
>  
> On Apr 26, 2019, at 8:35 AM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com 
> <mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>> wrote:
>  
> Hi,
> 
> please help reviewing these cleanups to the zipfs tests. In detail:
> 
> - Fix warnings in test/jdk/jdk/nio/zipfs/Demo.java (not a real testcase but 
> Demo coding)
> - change some calls of Runtime.version().major() to 
> Runtime.version().feature() (the former is deprecated)
> - change occurences of new Integer() to Integer.valueOf()
> - change occurences of class.newInstance() to 
> class.getDeclaredConstructor().newInstance()
> - remove unused variables
> - move test/jdk/jdk/nio/zipfs/jarfs/JFSTester.java to 
> test/jdk/jdk/nio/zipfs/JFSTester.java (not using the jarfs subfolder). There 
> is no need for this specific subfolder, given that MultiReleaseJarTest.java 
> neither isn't in the jarfs subfolder
> 
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8223015.0/ 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8223015.0/>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223015 
> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8223015>
> 
> I verified that the tests still succeed with the change.
> 
> Thanks
> Christoph
> 
>  
> <image001.gif> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
> 
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering 
> 1 Network Drive 
> Burlington, MA 01803
> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
>  
> 
> 
>  

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>



Reply via email to