On 6/24/19, 12:00 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
On 24/06/2019 18:24, Joe Wang wrote:
Keeping the code in sync with the BCEL (not perfect) source is in our
interest to produce smaller changeset in any future updates. Would
you be okay with the current webrevs?
Yes. This was just a remark that maybe the inconsistency should
be reported upstream (in case they want to fix it sometime in the
future). I wasn't suggesting to fix it downstream, or to postpone
the patch until it's fixed. Sorry if this wasn't clear.
Ah, ok. Thanks! :-)
Best,
Joe
best regards,
-- daniel
