Hi Naoto,

Thank you for adding the heading.  you rock :-)


> On Aug 13, 2019, at 11:06 AM, naoto.s...@oracle.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Lance,
> 
> I modified the headers of those two test cases as follows:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8211990/webrev.01/
> 
> Didn't bother changing others :-)
> 
> Naoto
> 
> On 8/12/19 3:46 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>> Hi Naoto
>>> On Aug 12, 2019, at 6:34 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Lance,
>>> 
>>> Yes, I would like the style, but AFAIK, all java.time tests are testng, and 
>>> controlled with the java/time/{test/tck}/TEST.properties file so that each 
>>> test file won't need jtreg tags (it cannot override them either).
>> Yes the @build,@run, @library would be handled via the TEST.properties and 
>> are not needed for the test because of TEST.properties.
>> The other tags are informational and do not impact the running of the test 
>> such as @test, @bug, @summary….
>> Anyways, no big deal either way, just thought I would ask.
>> have a good evening
>> Best
>> lance
>>> 
>>> Naoto
>>> 
>>> On 8/12/19 3:17 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>>> Hi Naoto,
>>>>> On Aug 12, 2019, at 6:01 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com 
>>>>> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for the review, Lance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 8/12/19 2:37 PM, Lance Andersen wrote:
>>>>>> Looks good Naoto.
>>>>>> One question I had which is not relevant to your fix, but should the 
>>>>>> tests as we modify them include the JTReg tags such as @bug, @summary…. 
>>>>>> etc…  just for consistency….
>>>>> 
>>>>> I put @bug tags to each of the modified test, but not @summary, et.al. It 
>>>>> seems that each test file corresponds to the java.time class, so adding 
>>>>> @summary for this bug might not fit. I could add @summary to existing 
>>>>> "Tests XXXX" statement, but keep it consistent with other java.time test 
>>>>> case files.
>>>> I was thinking more similar to:
>>>> open/test/jdk/jdk/nio/zipfs/TestPosix.java or 
>>>> open/test/jdk/java/nio/file/Files/StreamTest.java
>>>> ——————
>>>> /* @test
>>>> * @bug 8006884 8019526 8132539
>>>> * @library ..
>>>> * @build PassThroughFileSystem FaultyFileSystem
>>>> * @run testng StreamTest
>>>> * @summary Unit test for java.nio.file.Files methods that return a Stream
>>>> */
>>>> ————————
>>>> You won’t need the @run for these tests but each test is for a specific 
>>>> class such as OffsetDateTime and ZonedOffSetDateTime and all of the bugs 
>>>> are listed at the top of the file.
>>>> I am not sure we have agreed to standardize this historically, but I tend 
>>>> to when I update a test if applicable.
>>>> Anyways, just a suggestion… Feel free to ignore ;-)
>>>> Have a good rest of your evening :-)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Naoto
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>> Lance
>>>>>>> On Aug 12, 2019, at 4:43 PM, naoto.s...@oracle.com 
>>>>>>> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> 
>>>>>>> <mailto:naoto.s...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please review the fix to the following issue:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211990
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The proposed changeset is located at:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~naoto/8211990/webrev.00/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The DateTimeException was thrown due to unconditional conversion beyond 
>>>>>>> the valid range of the internal LocalDateTime value. If it happens, 
>>>>>>> normalize two instants with the offset of "start" instant. The same 
>>>>>>> kind of exception is observed with ZonedDateTime.until(), which is also 
>>>>>>> fixed in this changeset.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Naoto
>>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
>>>>>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>>>>> Oracle Java Engineering
>>>>>> 1 Network Drive
>>>>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>>>>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> 
>>>>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>>>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
>>>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>>>> Oracle Java Engineering
>>>> 1 Network Drive
>>>> Burlington, MA 01803
>>>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com> 
>>>> <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif><http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
>> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
>> Oracle Java Engineering
>> 1 Network Drive
>> Burlington, MA 01803
>> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>

 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>



Reply via email to