On 9/18/19 10:23 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov wrote: > So AFAIU from the above wiki page - first 8142543 should be closed as dup of > 8073347,
For this case, I would comment in JDK-8142543 that JDK-8073347 fixes the same thing, without closing as dup yet. Then finish the backport, then maybe close as dup. There are weird interactions between "open" and "closed" 8u versioning here... > then 8073347 > should be labeled jdk8u-fix-request with a comment like > > Fix Request (jdk8u) > Patch is trivial (documentation-only). Only slight path modification is > required due to > repo-consolidation past 8u, after which patch applies cleanly. Yes. You might also mention it fixes the regression introduced by JDK-8019857. -- Thanks, -Aleksey
