On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 10:32 PM Aleksey Shipilev <sh...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 9/18/19 10:23 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov wrote: > > So AFAIU from the above wiki page - first 8142543 should be closed as > dup of 8073347, > > For this case, I would comment in JDK-8142543 that JDK-8073347 fixes the > same thing, without closing > as dup yet. Then finish the backport, then maybe close as dup. There are > weird interactions between > "open" and "closed" 8u versioning here... > Ok > then 8073347 > > should be labeled jdk8u-fix-request with a comment like > > > > Fix Request (jdk8u) > > Patch is trivial (documentation-only). Only slight path modification is > required due to > > repo-consolidation past 8u, after which patch applies cleanly. > > Yes. You might also mention it fixes the regression introduced by > JDK-8019857. > Done
