Hi Christoph,

Something else that should probably be done as part of this proposed change is  
to clean up tests such as NodeCostDumpUtil.java and 
ModulesInCustomFileSystem.java and a few others as they have methods/fields 
etc... that make reference to the  Jar File System.  While it does not impact 
the tests as they are currently written, I think it would make sense to do this 
for clarity with the change you are making.

Best
Lance
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Lance Andersen <lance.ander...@oracle.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> Sorry for the late reply but I was out of the office Friday
>> On Nov 15, 2019, at 3:40 AM, Langer, Christoph <christoph.lan...@sap.com 
>> <mailto:christoph.lan...@sap.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Lance,
>> 
>> thanks for reviewing. I've addressed your points:
>> 
>>> I would suggesting moving the code added to the constructor for checking
>>> the releaseVersion/multi-release properties to a method and grouping it
>>> with the other methods added for supporting MR jars around line 1396.
>>> (keeps it easier to follow and maintain)
>> 
>> Done that.
> 
> Thank you.  I do think however we need to change the name of the method to 
> perhaps “checkReleaseVersionProperty” as the current name 
> “initializeMultiReleaseJar”  does not seem quite right to me.
> 
> I would also update the comment for the method to something like:
> 
> ----------------
> Checks to see if the Zip File System property  “releaseVersion” has been 
> specified.  If it has not been specified then check for the existence of the 
> “multi-release” property.   If set and the file represents a multi-release 
> JAR, determine the runtime version to use.
> ----------------
> 
>> 
>>> Could you also add a comment above the isMultiReleaseJar method to for
>>> clarity going forward (I know there was not one there before)
>> 
>> Done, too.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> I think we can tweak the comment slightly to something like
> 
> ———————
> Returns true if the Manifest main attribute “Multi-Release” is set to true; 
> false otherwise
> --------------------
>> 
>>> I might change the name of the lookup field in the method makeParentDirs
>>> with the addition of the Function lookup on line 126.
>> 
>> I chose to change the name of the global field in line 126 to be named 
>> mrlookup. Also updated the comment.
> 
> I am not sure “mrlookup” is the best name as this field is used with or 
> without a multi-release jar.  Perhaps “IndexNodeNameLookup” or
> “entryLookup"
>> 
>> This is the new webrev: 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8234089.2/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~clanger/webrevs/8234089.2/>
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Christoph
> 
> Thank you again!
> 
> Best
> Lance
>> 
> 
> <oracle_sig_logo.gif> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
> <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
>  <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
> Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
> Oracle Java Engineering 
> 1 Network Drive 
> Burlington, MA 01803
> lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif> 
<http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>
 <http://oracle.com/us/design/oracle-email-sig-198324.gif>Lance Andersen| 
Principal Member of Technical Staff | +1.781.442.2037
Oracle Java Engineering 
1 Network Drive 
Burlington, MA 01803
lance.ander...@oracle.com <mailto:lance.ander...@oracle.com>



Reply via email to