Hi Vicente,

I have also re-examined all the hotspot related code and everything looks fine - and very neat (kudos to you and Harold!).

A couple of nits:

src/hotspot/share/classfile/classFileParser.cpp
src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmtiClassFileReconstituter.cpp

Typo:

+ //    u2 attributs_count;

---

src/hotspot/share/classfile/javaClasses.cpp

You are using CHECK_0 in RecordComponent::create but that method returns oop. That seems wrong to me, but I see many other oop returning methods also use CHECK_0 so I'll take that up separately. (It's only a cosmetic issue.)

---

test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/records/abstractRecord.jcod

27 // This test is an Record marked as abstract.

s/an/a/

---

Thanks,
David
-----


On 28/11/2019 2:37 pm, Vicente Romero wrote:
Hi,

Please review the code for the records feature at [1]. This webrev includes all: APIs, runtime, compiler, serialization, javadoc, and more! Must of the code has been reviewed but there have been some changes since reviewers saw it. Also this is the first time an integral webrev is sent out for review. Last changes on top of my mind since last review iterations:

On the compiler implementation:
- it has been adapted to the last version of the language spec [2], as a reference the JVM spec is at [3]. This implied some changes in determining if a user defined constructor is the canonical or not. Now if a constructor is override-equivalent to a signature derived from the record components, then it is considered the canonical constructor. And any canonical constructor should satisfy a set of restrictions, see section 8.10.4 Record Constructor Declarations of the specification.
- It was also added a check to make sure that accessors are not generic.
- And that the canonical constructor, if user defined, is not explicitly invoking any other constructor.
- The list of forbidden record component names has also been updated.
- new error messages have been added

APIs:
- there have been some API editing in java.lang.Record, java.lang.runtime.ObjectMethods and java.lang.reflect.RecordComponent, java.io.ObjectInputStream, javax.lang.model (some visitors were added)

On the JVM implementation:
- some logging capabilities have been added to classFileParser.cpp to provide the reason for which the Record attribute has been ignored

Reflection:
- there are several new changes to the implementation of java.lang.reflect.RecordComponent apart from the spec changes mentioned before.

bug fixes in
- compiler
- serialization,
- JVM, etc

As a reference the last iteration of the previous reviews can be found at [4] under folders: compiler, hotspot_runtime, javadoc, reflection and serialization,

TIA,
Vicente

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/records.review/all_code/webrev.00/
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep359/jep359-20191125/specs/records-jls.html [3] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep359/jep359-20191125/specs/records-jvms.html
[4] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vromero/records.review/

Reply via email to